Legal Opinion
Omaha Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Mullenax
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1982No. 44154PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
This is an action to quiet title to real estate allegedly acquired by conveyance, accretion, and adverse possession. The District Court, upon defendants’ motion, dismissed plaintiffs’ petition without prejudice for failure to diligently prosecute. Plaintiffs have appealed.
On February 3, 1976, The Omaha National Bank, as trustee of a trust in which plaintiffs William F. Neal and Mary Linda Neal Reber were sole beneficiaries, filed this action against the defendants Melvin E. and Mabel C. Mullenax to quiet title to various tracts of real estate allegedly acquired by conveyance, accretion, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pyle v. Wolf CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1972
- Estate of Pewthers v. Holland Page Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Simmons v. MurrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Moore v. GunningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lynch, Inc. v. Samatamason Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hays v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Ashfort Corp. v. Palmetto Construction Group, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.