Legal Opinion

Nippold v. Romero

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1956No. Civ. 21613PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants entered on a jury verdict in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when he came in contact with an automobile owned by defendant Chavez and operated with his permission by defendant Romero.

On May 1, 1954, about 9 ¡45 p. m., plaintiff was walking west across Figueroa Street in the middle of the block where there was no crosswalk when he was struck by the left front side of the automobile going south on Figueroa. Figueroa is 66 feet wide and is divided in the center by double white lines. At the time of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Ford v. CHESLEY TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Tidlund v. Seven Up Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Dyer v. KnueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Hickambottom v. Cooper Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Fambrini v. StikkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API