Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Jones

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 8, 2006No. 01-04-00656-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Ronald X. Gordon, appeals pro se to challenge dismissal with prejudice of his claims against appellees, Mildred Jones and James Albro, in response to Albro’s motion. Appellant’s five points of error present the following two issues for review: (1) whether the trial court erred by dismissing the case with prejudice based on Albro’s contention that a different court had acquired dominant jurisdiction over appellant’s claims and (2) whether the trial court erred by not filing findings of fact and conclusions of law. We agree that the trial court…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Scott v. Gallagher, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. In re OSG Ship Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  4. Ysasaga v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. King v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API