Legal Opinion

State v. Hockaday

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 3, 2008No. 35976-6-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

184 P.3d 1273 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Adam Jeffery HOCKADAY, Appellant.

No. 35976-6-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

June 3, 2008.

Valerie Marushige, Attorney at Law, Kent, WA, for Appellant.

Susan Irene Baur, Cowlitz Co. Prosecutor's Office, Kelso, WA, for Respondent.

HUNT, J.

¶ 1 Adam Jeffery Hockaday appeals his conviction for resisting arrest. He argues that under State v. Pelkey, 109 Wash.2d 484, 745 P.2d 854 (1987), the trial court erred when it allowed the State to amend the resisting arrest charge after the State had rested its case in chief. Because Hockaday…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. MarkleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State v. GehrkeWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. GehrkeWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. HockadayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. HockadayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API