Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Gehrke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2019No. 95635-9Published

1Concurrence

FAIRHURST, C.J. (concurring)

¶ 40 CrR 2.1(d) permits amendments to criminal charges "at any time before verdict or finding if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced." We have established a bright line rule that "[a] criminal charge may not be amended after the State has rested its case in chief unless the amendment is to a lesser degree of the same charge or a lesser included offense" because such an amendment creates prejudice per se. State v. Pelkey, 109 Wash.2d 484, 491, 745 P.2d 854 (1987) (emphasis added). I agree with the dissent that maintaining this bright line rule is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API