State v. Gehrke
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence
FAIRHURST, C.J. (concurring)
¶ 40 CrR 2.1(d) permits amendments to criminal charges "at any time before verdict or finding if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced." We have established a bright line rule that "[a] criminal charge may not be amended after the State has rested its case in chief unless the amendment is to a lesser degree of the same charge or a lesser included offense" because such an amendment creates prejudice per se. State v. Pelkey, 109 Wash.2d 484, 491, 745 P.2d 854 (1987) (emphasis added). I agree with the dissent that maintaining this bright line rule is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.