Legal Opinion

State v. Hockaday

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 7, 2009No. 35976-6-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

204 P.3d 283 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Adam Jeffery HOCKADAY, Appellant.

No. 35976-6-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 7, 2009.

Valerie Marushige, Attorney at Law, Kent, WA, for Appellant.

Susan Irene Baur, Cowlitz Co. Prosecutor's Office, Kelso, WA, for Respondent.

HUNT, J.

¶ 1 In State v. Hockaday, 144 Wash.App. 918, 184 P.3d 1273, review granted, 165 Wash.2d 1007, 201 P.3d 309 (2008), we held that the State's amendment of the information after it had rested its case was not reversible error because the defendant knew about and agreed to this amendment before the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HockadayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. HockadayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API