Legal Opinion
Barbett v. Logistics Application, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1720PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Michael Barbett was employed by Defendant Logistics Application, Inc. (LAI) at a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission worksite. After being terminated in May 2010, he filed this suit asserting that such termination violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. In now moving to dismiss the Complaint, Defendant correctly argues that Plaintiff failed to timely file his claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. As a result, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion.
I. Background
According to Plaintiffs two-page…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- ['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Wise v. FerrieroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Azzam v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Feloni v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- McCoy v. Yelp Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.