Legal Opinion

Radney v. Clear Lake Forest Community Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1984No. A14-83-511-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from judgment finding a violation of a deed restriction, granting a mandatory injunction and awarding attorneys fees. Appellants raise fifty-one points of error arguing that: the restrictive covenant in question was ambiguous; ap-pellee, Clear Lake Forest Community Association, Inc., was not a proper party to enforce the restrictive covenant; appellees were estopped from enforcing the restriction; the Texas Fraudulent Conveyance statute is not applicable to this case; there was legally and factually insufficient evidence to support the finding that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Chandler v. WelbornTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Texas Sand Company v. ShieldTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wood v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Cox v. ShropshireTexas Supreme Court · 1860

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Duran v. Henderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Freedman v. Briarcroft Property Owners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Selvage v. J.J. Johnson & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Kaufmann v. Morales, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Hiner v. HoffmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API