Legal Opinion

Hiner v. Hoffman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1999No. 21408PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

Defendants-appellants Michael J. Hoffman and Minako Suzuki, also known as Minako S. Hoffman [hereinafter, collectively, the Hoff-mans], appeal from the circuit court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment brought by plaintiffs-appellees Frances A. Hiner, James Dukes, Gladys Hollman, and Pacific Palisades Community Association [hereinafter, collectively, the plaintiffs-appel-lees] and denying the Hoffmans’ cross-motion for summary judgment. The central issue on appeal is the interpretation of language in a 1966 restrictive covenant running with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Waikiki Malia Hotel, Inc. v. Kinkai Properties Limited PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Richard v. MetcalfHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Foster v. NehlsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brescia v. North Shore OhanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Stallard v. Consolidated Maui, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Thomas v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  4. Allen v. ReedColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Fong v. HashimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API