Legal Opinion

Bruning v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1937No. A-9243PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

Upon an information against H. R. Bruning, Rosa E. Bell, Albert Zirm, and others, charging them with the crime of forgery, the defendant H. R. Bruning ashed for and was granted a severance. Upon his trial the jury returned their verdict finding him guilty of forgery in the second degree, leaving the punishment to the court. The court overruled the motion for a new trial on June 26, 1936, and rendered judgment and sentenced defendant to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction he appeals.

The information charged that in Oklahoma county on the 25th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Ex Parte ConwayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Bristow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API