Legal Opinion

In Re Wasserman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 20, 1961No. Misc. 32-61PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is a proceeding brought by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to require Jack Wasserman and David Car-liner, who are members of this bar, to respond to an administrative summons in connection with the investigation of income tax returns of one Carlos Marcello and Vincent Marcello, who were clients of the two respondents in this proceeding. The information sought is the amount of fees paid by the two taxpayers to the respondents as their counsel for legal services, the dates of payments, and by or through whom the payments were made.

This proceeding is instituted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Montship Lines, Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. In Re Grand Jury Appearance of Alvin S. Michaelson, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States of America and E. C. Talley, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Paul R. HodgsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. In the Matter of Laurence Semel, Bankrupt. Laurence SemelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API