Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Kendall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2003No. 03AP-6 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, city of Columbus, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, dismissing appellant’s complaint against defendant-appellee, Rachel Kendall, on the grounds that the city’s community noise ordinance, Columbus City Code (“CCC”) 2329.11(C), is unconstitutionally vague on its face.

{¶ 2} On August 30, 2002, appellant filed a complaint against appellee, alleging a violation of CCC 2329.11. On December 11, 2002, appellee filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.

{¶ 3} The matter came…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Fambrough v. City of East Cleveland, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
  3. Fambrough v. City of East Cleveland, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API