Legal Opinion
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Koontz
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 16, 1996No. 5-95-0191PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag
Defendant, James Koontz, appeals from a deficiency judgment entered against him and in favor of the plaintiff, Chrysler Credit Corporation (Chrysler), in the amount of $4,439.92.
Koontz entered into an agreement with Chrysler to purchase a 1988 Plymouth Sundance in exchange for 60 monthly payments of $185.92. Koontz defaulted on the contract in early 1991. Chrysler notified Koontz that it would repossess the vehicle if Koontz did not make up the missed payments. Koontz notified Chrysler that he would make every effort to catch up on the payments, that he did not want the vehicle to be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hester v. BandyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Census Federal Credit Union v. WannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bloomquist v. First National Bank of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- H. Ray Rogers, D/B/A Ray Rogers Company v. Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp., Chiles Tractor and MacHinery CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kerry A. Clarin Colleen v. Clarin v. Minnesota Repossessors, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Rivera v. Dealer Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Giles v. First Virginia Credit Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Callaway v. WhittentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.