Callaway v. Whittenton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Christopher Callaway and Joy Callaway appeal from a judgment as a matter of law entered in favor of Michael Whittenton. They argue that their claims alleging wrongful repossession and trespass should have been submitted to the jury. We affirm the trial court's judgment as a matter of law as to the trespass claim, reverse it as to the wrongful-repossession claim, and remand the case.
I
On May 10, 2000, Christopher Callaway purchased a 1993 Geo Tracker sport utility vehicle from Summerdale Budget Auto Truck, Inc.("Budget"). Baldwin Finance, Inc., which financed the Callaways' purchase of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Palm Harbor Homes, Inc. v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ricwil, Inc. v. S.L. Pappas and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- General Finance Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Alleyne v. Diageo USVI, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Droge v. AAAA Two Star Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2020
- Vest v. VestCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.