Legal Opinion

Thorsteinsson v. M/V Drangur

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 16, 1990No. 89-5058PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

This admiralty appeal involves two seamen, plaintiffs-appellants Thorsteinsson and Havardsson, who brought suit in rem asserting various maritime liens against their vessel, the M/V Drangur (“Dran-gur”), after it had been bought by Utvegs-banki Islands HF (“Bank”) at a judicial sale in Iceland. Plaintiffs-appellants also sued Vikur Shipping, their employer, in person-am on the same claims. The district court found that the Icelandic judicial sale had extinguished all prior liens against the Drangur and entered final summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Office of Thrift Supervision v. PaulDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
  2. Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Cooperative Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
  3. Ramirez v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  4. Amoco Oil Co. v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
  5. R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. the Wrecked & Abandoned VesselDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API