Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Holder

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1935No. 8 Div. 645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff’s car and contents were destroyed in the night by collision at a road crossing with defendant’s passenger train, and, from a judgment fór plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The crossing was not a public road crossing, and the provisions of section 9952, Code 1923, were therefore inapplicable. Walker v. Ala., Tenn. & Northern Ry. Co., 194 Ala. 360, 70 So. 125, 127.

But the crossing, though not a public one, did serve the public of that neighborhood, and the defendant held out an invitation to the public to cross at this particular place by preparing and maintaining the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. Alabama, Tennessee & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. CampbellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Woodward Iron Co. v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SmelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API