Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1942No. 8 Div. 195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for damages for destruction of her motor truck resulting from collision with a locomotive, while the truck was stalled on a road crossing. Count 1 of the complaint charged the loss to the negligent operation of the train at a public road crossing. This count, under our rules, included negligence after discovery of peril.

Count 2 was a special count based on negligence after discovery of peril, not naming the character of the crossing.

Count 3 charged negligent operation of the train at a crossing which, for many years, had been prepared, kept and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Locklin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Walker v. Alabama, Tennessee & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Ritter v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Whaley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. CampbellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PulliamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Model City Lumber Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Model City Lumber Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API