Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Hale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1931No. 7 Div. 20PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiff’s car was demolished by defendant’s passenger train at a public road crossing in the open country in Cherokee county, for which recovery of damages under simple negligence counts is sought. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The crossing was not on a curve, though there was a curve some 200 or 225 feet below the crossing, somewhat obstructing the view at that point. Plaintiff’s counsel cite the statute (section 9952, Code 1923) as applicable, especially to the question of speed shown to be from 30 to 35 miles per hour. But, as pointed out in the recent case of Atlantic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railroad v. DeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Hines v. ChampionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  5. Bagdad Land & Lumber Co. v. MoneywaySupreme Court of Florida · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Southern Railway Company v. McCamySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SmelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API