Legal Opinion

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Picard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1940No. 3722PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to appellee caused by a collision between an automobile (police car) in which he was riding and a freight car of appellant standing on and over a street crossing in the City of Beaumont, Texas. The several acts of negligence charged against appellant were fully alleged. Appellant answered by general demurrer, general denial, and specially that appellee was guilty of contributory negligence that caused and contributed to his injury.

The case was tried to a jury upon special issues, in answer to which they found: (a) That…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trochta v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Karr v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Peagler v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  5. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API