Boyce v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The trial court’s determination adverse to appellant insurer of the factual issue of its “giving notice” of cancellation was correct. Upon the entire record, no other conclusion would be sustainable. Plaintiff insureds assert, of course, that the insurer was properly held liable but ask that “ if that determination should be overruled ”, the judgment dismissing their complaint in their action against the respondent bank be reversed. A recovery against the insurer, upon final determination of the action against it, might render the other action and the third-party action moot, except, perhaps,…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Wesson v. Jefferson Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Rocque v. Co-Op. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Honaker v. Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Manning v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.