Legal Opinion

Henry v. Warner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1976No. 73-1694Published

1Opinion of the Court

536 F.2d 303

Daniel Edward HENRY, etc., et al., Individually and on

behalf of all persons similarly situated, et al.,

Intervenors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Honorable John E. WARNER, Individually and in his capacity

as Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 73-1694.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

May 17, 1976.

Nathan Zahm (argued), Sherman Oaks, Cal., for appellee.

Joel Levine and John E. Nordin, Asst. U. S. Attys. (argued), of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants.OPINION

On Remand

Before ELY, HUFSTEDLER, and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

1

The District Court held that a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middendorf v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Daigle v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Henry v. WarnerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
  4. Henry v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API