Legal Opinion

Henry v. Warner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1974No. 73-1694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Under the compulsion of this court’s opinion in Daigle v. Warner (9th Cir. 1973), 490 F.2d 358, the orders and judgment are ordered vacated and the cause is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in the light of Daigle.*

Judges Ely and Hufstedler disagree with the holding of Daigle in that both believe that, absent emergency circumstances, the due process clause requires the appointment of counsel or a counsel substitute in all summary courts martial, without the limitations placed upon that right by the majority of the Daigle panel. Judge Ely adds his thought that if, under…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Henry v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API