Legal Opinion
Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 29, 2021No. 3:18-cv-01298Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YOUSSIF KAMAL, GILLIAN NEELY, Case No.: 18-CV-1298 TWR (AGS) RICHARD LICHTEN, SUSAN COX, 12 NICK TOVAR, MICHELE KINMAN, ORDER: (1) DENYING 13 ASHLEY PETEFISH, and TERRI PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR BROWN, on their own behalf and on VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 behalf of all others similarly situated, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND 15 (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS Plaintiffs, TO CHOOSE WHETHER TO 16 v. CONTINUE LITIGATING THIS 17 ACTION OR DISMISS THEIR EDEN CREAMERY, LLC, dba HALO INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITH 18 TOP CREAMERY; and JUSTIN T.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- James Hamilton, as Administrator of the Estate of Gordon Daniel Hamilton, Deceased v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Christopher Hargis v. Phil Foster, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron and D. H.O. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.