Christopher Hargis v. Phil Foster, Beauchamp, Lahaei, D.W. McEcheron and D. H.O. Crawford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion of this court filed March 7, 2002, slip op. at 3727 [282 F.3d 1154], is amended as follows:
On page 3737 [at 1159] of the slip opinion, delete the first sentence of the first full paragraph, and substitute in its stead:
Based on this evidence, a jury could reasonably conclude that the prison officials acted unreasonably in characterizing Hargis’s statements as an attempt to coerce Beauchamp into not enforcing the shaving rule.
On page 3738 [at 1159] delete the entirety of the text of III. after the heading. Replace it with the following:
Hargis requested voluntary dismissal of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Shaw v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- John Entler v. Christine GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Youssif Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Ruiz v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Paula Leever v. Carson, City of Consolidated Municipality of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.