Legal Opinion

State v. Putman

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1967No. 56Published

1Opinion of the Court

434 P.2d 77 (1967)

78 N.M. App. 552

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Haskel PUTMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 56.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

October 6, 1967.

Rehearing Denied November 2, 1967.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Joel M. Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellant.

Foster Windham, Carlsbad, for appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

By Count II of the information, defendant was accused of sodomy. The information was supplemented by a bill of particulars. The trial court sustained defendant's motion to quash on the ground that the acts alleged did not constitute sodomy. The State…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Norton v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bennett v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. PutmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API