Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Abram

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1953No. 5594PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. The decisive question is whether carnal copulation per os constitutes the crime of sodomy. Chronologically, the events in the crime charged may be stated as follows: On May 17, 1951, while petitioners were confined in the common jail of Quay County under a charge of burglary, they were apprehended in the commission of acts of unnatural sexual copulation per os between themselves and another prisoner then confined in jail with them. They were taken before the trial court and upon their pleas of guilty to an information charging…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Herring v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Kinnan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Koontz v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. People v. SchmittMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Harris v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. PutmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. MasseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Harris v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API