Legal Opinion

Connell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1939No. 27,111PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, C. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of sodomy as defined by section 10-4221 Burns’ Ind. St. 1933, section 2603 Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934. The indictment is in the language of the statute and charges the crime as therein defined. Sodomy is a crime the meaning of which is well known, and, as many courts have stated, its nature is too disgusting to be further defined.

This court has held many times that an indictment charging a crime in the language of the statute is sufficient. Further, it is held in Glover v. State (1913), 179 Ind. 459, 101 N. E. 629, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Pettit v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. MurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Davidson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. LairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. State v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Dixon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Stearsman, Peak, Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. CALVIN FARRELL HADLEY v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API