Legal Opinion

Eunice v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1983No. 65545PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Plaintiff Citicorp Homeowners, Inc. filed a petition for a writ of possession for the mobile home securing its loan to defendants. Defendants now appeal the grant of summary judgment for plaintiff, asserting that the trial court failed to consider the entire record in reaching its decision. Four documents are identified as those assertedly ignored: defendants’ responses to plaintiffs request for admissions, defendants’ answers to plaintiffs first interrogatories and defendants’ two depositions.

1. In regard to the first two documents, defendants’ contention is wholly without merit.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. General Motors Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Irvin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Hurston v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Bimbo Builders, Inc. v. STUBBS PROPERTIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Drier v. Great American Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Stegall v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Perry v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Sunn v. Trophy Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Murphy v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API