Murphy v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Banke, Presiding Judge.
The appellee bank sued the appellant to recover the balance due on a promissory note payable by its terms on demand. This appeal is from the grant of the bank’s motion for summary judgment. Held:
1. The appellant contends that as the result of the bank’s acceptance of “repeated, late and irregular payments” on the note, a quasi new agreement was created pursuant to OCGA § 13-4-4, requiring the bank to notify him of its intention to rely on “the exact terms of the agreement” prior to filing suit. It is quite unclear to this court how payments made under a demand note…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelley v. FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Fulton National Bank v. Willis Denney Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- MILLER GRADING &C. v. Ga. Fed. &C. Assn.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Whiteside v. Douglas County BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Eunice v. Citicorp Homeowners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taquechel v. Chattahoochee BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Andrews v. City of MacOnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Jernigan Auto Parts, Inc. v. Commercial State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Miller, Stevenson & Steinichen, Inc. v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Johnson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.