Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hartley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1977No. 10980PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

On motion of defendants, rehearing was granted. We withdraw the prior decision, and substitute the following.

Until now this case has been poorly pleaded, ineptly tried and badly judged on all issues at all levels, including this one.

Plaintiffs, John H. Jackson, Jr. and Norma S. Jackson (Jackson) filed a quiet-title suit against defendants, Earl H. Hartley and Mary Hartley (Hartley) and others, including the Property Appraisal Department of the State of New Mexico, seeking to establish title to three lots in Grants, New Mexico. The trial court found for Jackson and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Greene v. EsquibelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Morris v. RossNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. HennesseeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Union Land & Grazing Co. v. ArceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Doe v. HendricksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Baker v. BenedictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ortega, Snead, Dixon & Hanna v. GennittiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tres Ladrones, Inc. v. FitchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Montoya v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API