Montoya v. Medina
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} “In a case tried by the court without a jury, ... the court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law when a party makes a timely request.” Rule 1-052(A) NMRA. The reasons for this requirement are to aid “the appellate court by placing before it the basis of the decision of the trial court; to require care on the part of the trial judge in ... consideration and adjudication of the facts; and for the purposes of res judicata and estoppel by judgment.” Mora v. Martinez, 80 N.M. 88, 89-90, 451 P.2d 992, 993-94 (1969). This case exemplifies the importance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Mora v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Green v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. ValerioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Martinez v. Martinez TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Montoya v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011