Legal Opinion

Montoya v. Medina

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2009No. 27,386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} “In a case tried by the court without a jury, ... the court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law when a party makes a timely request.” Rule 1-052(A) NMRA. The reasons for this requirement are to aid “the appellate court by placing before it the basis of the decision of the trial court; to require care on the part of the trial judge in ... consideration and adjudication of the facts; and for the purposes of res judicata and estoppel by judgment.” Mora v. Martinez, 80 N.M. 88, 89-90, 451 P.2d 992, 993-94 (1969). This case exemplifies the importance of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Mora v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Green v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  5. DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. ValerioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Martinez v. Martinez TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Montoya v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API