Legal Opinion

Scott v. Texas Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Eastland County. Tried below before Hon. J. H. Calhoun.

1Opinion of the Court

COHHER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff in error instituted this suit to recover damages in the sum of four thousand dollars because of an alleged negligent failure on the part of defendant in error to seasonably furnish cars for a shipment of some 850 three to four year old steers from Albany, Texas, to Dublin and Hico, Texas, and also because of alleged negligence in the transportation of such cattle in the month of Hovember, 1906. After the introduction of the testimony the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find in favor of defendant in error, and a verdict and judgment in accordance with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mustain, Exr. v. StokesTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bowman v. Texas Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Rogers & AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Lancaster v. HollebekeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Rule Cotton Oil Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Lancaster v. Rogers & AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API