Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Rogers & Adams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1921No. 1256. [fn*]Published

Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; Ballard Coldwell, Judge. Action by Rogers • & Adams and others against J. L. Lancaster and another, as receivers of the Tesas & Pacific Railway, and the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company. Judgment for the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company but against the receivers, and the latter appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This is an action brought by Rogers & Adams against J. L. Lancaster and C. L. Wallace as receivers of the Tesas & Pacific Railway, together with the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company, to recover damages by reason of the alleged negligent handling of a carload of 34 head of mules originally contracted to be shipped over the Tesas & Pacific Railway from El •Paso, Tes., to Chillicothe, Tes., via Sweet-water, but diverted by the shippers at Sweet-water to Adrian, Tes. The negligent acts charged against the receivers and submitted1 to the jury are rough handling and delay in transit, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railway Co. v. R. E. Maddox & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API