Ohio Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Yant
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSherick, P. J.
This is a pole-in-the-road case, instituted by the telegraph company for damages to its equipment. Its solution, in view of the pronouncements found in Cambridge Home Telephone Co. v. Harrington, 127 Ohio St., 1, 186 N. E., 611, and Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Lung, Admx., 129 Ohio St., 505, 196 N. E., 371, is approached with the usual deference, but without diffidence in the soundness of our conclusion herein reached.
The defendant, Yant, was the owner of a Ford roadster. Defendant, Dye, was its driver. They, with two other grown people, occupied the car’s only seat. While proceeding northeasterly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. LungOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Cambridge Home Telephone Co. v. HarringtonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Turowski v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Turner v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Shope v. PortsmouthOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Neiderbrach v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Snay v. BurrOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.