Legal Opinion
United States v. Pool and Canfield, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 14, 1991No. 91-0596-CV-W-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GAITAN, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Safeco Insurance Company of America’s (hereafter defendant) motion for a preliminary injunction prohibiting Capital Electric from proceeding to arbitrate its claims against defendant. It is defendant’s contention that it cannot be compelled to arbitrate any claims arising in the above titled action because (1) it is not a party to any arbitration agreement with the plaintiff, and (2) as a Miller Act surety, the exclusive jurisdiction for plaintiff’s action is federal district court.
The defendant is seeking a preliminary injunction to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McLaughlin Gormley King Company v. Terminix International Company, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Milestone Tarant, LLC v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Tiffany v. Ko Huts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016
- Edward E. Gillen Co. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Bright Metal Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.