Legal Opinion
Tiffany v. Ko Huts, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 2016No. CIV-15-1190-HEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1143ORDER
JOE HEATON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Michael Tiffany filed this action on behalf of himself and other delivery drivers for defendant KO Huts, Inc. (“KO Huts”), which operates Pizza Hut franchise stores in several states. He asserts claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and under the Oklahoma Minimum Wage Act (“OMWA”), 40 Okla. Stat. §§ 197.1-197.14, to recover unpaid minimum wages. Defendant KO Huts filed a motion to compel plaintiff to arbitrate his claims only on an individual basis.
Plaintiff responded by filing a motion to strike…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Bob Moore Auto Group LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Hulstrunk v. Ultracell Insulation, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018
- Hulstrunk v. Ultracell Insulation, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2018