Legal Opinion

Arizona State Board of Regents v. Arizona State Personnel Board

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 8, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0478PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

Appellant Camille Kimball (“Kimball”) challenges the trial court’s ruling that the Arizona State Personnel Board (“Personnel Board”) does not have jurisdiction over her whistleblower complaint and that the Arizona State University employee grievance procedure provides the only forum for her complaint. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Kimball filed a complaint with the Personnel Board alleging reprisal pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 38-531 (“The Whistleblower Act”). Kimball is employed as a producer and writer at KAET television…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. BarlowArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona State Board of Regents Ex Rel. Arizona State University v. Arizona State Personnel BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sagers v. PanchanathanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API