Legal Opinion

Arizona State Board of Regents Ex Rel. Arizona State University v. Arizona State Personnel Board

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1999No. CV-98-0237-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 PINION.

MARTONE, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to decide whether the Administrative Procedure Act allows an agency to exempt itself from the rights to counsel and subpoena contained in A.R.S. § 41-1062 (1992). We hold that it does not.

I

¶ 2 In May 1994, Camille Kimball, an employee of public television station KAET, a department of Arizona State University, complained to the United States Department of Labor that Arizona State University failed to properly pay her for overtime. In December 1994, believing that Arizona State University had taken reprisal against her for complaining to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Kendall v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Dioguardi v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Forman v. Creighton School District No. 14Arizona Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System CouncilArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. BrnovichDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  3. Saguaro Healing LLC v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Pima County v. Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System CouncilCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API