Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1935No. 17155Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In an unusually well prepared and able motion for rehearing, — and upon a review of many decisions of this court, — appellant insists that our opinion of affirmance was wrong and against the weight of authority in this State.

We have carefully examined the cases cited and others, in the light of the motion, but are not able to agree with appellant. We do not find that condition of conflict on the question of the proper disposition of a complaint of misconduct of the jury based on the use of appellant’s failure to testify, — which appellant asserts.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buessing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Home Insurance Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Rees v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API