Legal Opinion
Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles Wolf
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 22, 1990No. 89-8073PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the propriety of summary judgment in an antitrust action brought by a private plaintiff. The action alleges, among other things, violations of sections 2(a), 2(d), 2(e), and 2(f) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Pat-man Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13(a), (d), (e), and (f). The court below concluded that summary judgment was appropriate. After reviewing the record we conclude otherwise, and therefore reverse.
I
Alan’s of Atlanta, Inc. (“AA”) was an Atlanta-based “specialty” retailer of cameras and related equipment. It had stores in Atlanta…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Cheryl P. Francis v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Incorporated, Reserve Officers Association, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. v. United Parcel Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Rebel Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.