Legal Opinion

Cundy v. Weber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1941No. File No. 8390PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The complaint of plaintiff alleges the right to divert and use sixty-nine miner’s inches of the waters of Higgins’ Gulch in Lawrence County for irrigation of his farm and for other uses, and that the defendants, during the years immediately preceding the commencement of this action, have wrongfully interfered with that right and have diverted all of the flow of that stream. Plaintiff prays for an adjudication of his right and that defendants be permanently enjoined from diverting water in derogation of that right.

The defendants’ answer alleges a prior appropriation and right to the use of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. St. Germain Irrigating Ditch Co. v. Hawthorne Ditch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lounsberry v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Hufford v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Cantrall v. Sterling Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Raschke v. DeGraffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. 79 Ranch, Inc. v. PitschMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ford v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Wells v. WellsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Smith v. Widmann Hotel Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API