Legal Opinion

Cantrall v. Sterling Mining Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Jackson: H. K. Hanna, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court 1

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

2Opinion of the Court · BurnettJustice Burnett

1. At the hearing a motion was presented, on behalf of plaintiffs, without argument, to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the transcript had not been filed within 30 days after the appeal was perfected. This was predicated upon the assumption that the 30 days began to run five days after service of the undertaking on appeal. This would be true if nó exception to the surety on the undertaking had been filed within the five days. The appellant however, having suggested a diminution of the record, the clerk of the circuit court forwarded additional matter that…

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kaller v. SpadyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cundy v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Benz v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API