Pecanty v. Pecanty
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
FAIR, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Joe and Marsha Pecanty were divorced on the ground of Joe’s adultery. Joe appeals, arguing the chancellor erred in (1) classifying marital and separate property, (2) dividing marital property, and (3) awarding lump-sum and rehabilitative alimony. Finding the chancellor’s decision was supported by the evidence and the correct standards were applied, we affirm.
FACTS
¶ 2. This is a second marriage for both Joe, 49, and Marsha, 41. Each had two children when they married in March 2000.
¶ 3. When they married, Marsha was a medical-records clerk. In his brief Joe stated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dissolution of the Marriage of Spriggs v. BuechlerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014