Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1993No. 92-CA-0130PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nina Frances (Peters) Armstrong appeals from final judgment rendered in a divorce action severing her 21 year marriage. She challenges the failure of the trial court to award her lump sum alimony and adequate, periodic alimony, a portion of her spouse's pension plan and stock, as well as the court's refusal to award her attorney's fees and require Mr. Armstrong to pay the second mortgage on the marital residence. We affirm in part and reverse and render in part.

Stanley and Nina Armstrong, married in July of 1971 and, divorced in January of 1992. Two children were born to this union, namely,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brabham v. BrabhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  4. RC Petroleum, Inc. v. HernandezMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. East v. EastMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brooks v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Carrow v. CarrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API