Legal Opinion

Hemsley v. Hemsley

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1994No. 92-CA-00423PublishedCited by 226 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

639 So.2d 909 (1994)

James Michael HEMSLEY,

v.

Elizabeth M. HEMSLEY.

No. 92-CA-00423.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 7, 1994.

William P. Featherston, Jr., Ridgeland, for appellant.

B. Ruth Johnson, Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

PITTMAN, Justice, for the Court:

Elizabeth M. Hemsley (Bitsy) filed a complaint for divorce against James M. Hemsley (Mike) on April 4, 1991, alleging as grounds for divorce, inter alia, irreconcilable differences pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 93-5-2 (Supp. 1992). On January 10, 1992, Mike and Bitsy filed a consent in writing, signed by both parties,…

Also in this document: Dissent · McRAE; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent · Lee; Dissent · McRAE.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. LaRue v. LaRueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by226 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Heigle v. HeigleMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brooks v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Carrow v. CarrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API