Legal Opinion

Crowley v. City of Hood River

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 2018No. A166978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

*241In this land use case, petitioner, a citizen of Hood River, seeks review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order that affirmed the City of Hood River's decision to approve a quasi-judicial zone change to a city park from Open Space/Public Facilities (OS/PF) to Urban High Density Residential (R-3). In affirming the city's decision, LUBA deferred to the city's interpretation of Hood River Comprehensive Plan (HRCP) Goal 8 Policy 1 under ORS 197.829(1)1 and Siporen v. City of Medford , 349 Or. 247, 259, 243 P.3d 776 (2010). On review, petitioner argues that LUBA erred in granting the city…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Setniker v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crowley v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API