Legal Opinion

Gordetsky v. Cohen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

20 N.J. Super. 11 (1952)

89 A.2d 84

SADYE GORDETSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

WILLIAM COHEN, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 12, 1952.

Decided May 19, 1952.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FRANCIS.

Mr. Joseph W. Jantausch argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Milton C. Yarrow, attorney).

Mr. Jack L. Cohen argued the cause for the appellants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

This action is governed, and affirmance of the judgment required, by Tappin's Jewelry Stores v. Rosner, 111 N.J.L. 301 (E. & A. 1933).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Appeals of Port Murray Dairy Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Wilentz v. Crown Laundry Service, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Schwartz v. King Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Schwartz v. King Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  5. Tappin's Jewelry Stores, Inc. v. RosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Seattle v. ShepherdWashington Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API