Schwartz v. King Realty & Investment Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 111.
1Opinion of the Court
*135The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, ,T.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. 93 N. J. L. 111. The state of the case sets forth the existence of the chattel mortgage, the public sale by auction, the purchase of the go.oda by the plaintiff; that he paid the auctioneer for his purchase; that thereafter the mortgagee was paid and his indebtedness canceled.
We concur in the view of the Supreme- Court as to the propriety of bringing replevin against the present defendant. As to the construction of the Bulk Sales- act (Pcmnéh. L. 1915, p. 377) we reach the same result…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wasserman v. McDonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Mills v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Englewood State Bank v. TegtmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Slow v. Ohio Valley Roofing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Smith v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Talty v. SchoenholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Winters National Bank & Tr Co. v. Midland Acceptance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.