Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Shepherd

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1980No. 45926PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

This is a consolidated appeal of cases in which defendants were charged with theft pursuant to Seattle Criminal Code § 12A.08.220(1)(a). The trial court dismissed all cases. We accepted direct review pursuant to RAP 4.2 and reverse the trial court.

James Shepherd, Sam Stusser and Sam Sloy (defendants at the trial level) own or operate pawnshops in Seattle. Each openly obtained property in pawn transactions. When it later developed the pawned property had been stolen, all refused to return the property to the rightful owners until reimbursed for the pawn fees. The owners refused to pay.

Defendant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Childers v. ChildersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API