Legal Opinion

State v. McKaughen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1985No. 14682PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether a sentence for the crime of escape may be made consecutive not only to the sentence(s) being served when the escape occurred but also to another sentence imposed for a separate crime committed by the escapee while he was at large. Based upon the language of Idaho’s escape statute, we hold that the escape sentence must begin upon discharge from the sentence(s) being served when the escape occurred.

The question is framed by the following facts. Michael McKaughen escaped from custody in Idaho while serving a thirteen-year prison sentence for robbery. 1 Making…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MendenhallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. HaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. RollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. PaulIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API